🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.